🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be slashed by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations often spent years building local support and pushing their councils to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to create other types of wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.